October 6, 2024

Nikopol Game

E-Sport News

Strategy games to improve environmental policymaking

Strategy games to improve environmental policymaking

  • Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Díaz, S. et al. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • Global Biodiversity Outlook 5 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020).

  • Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Waeber, P. O. et al. Choices we make in times of crisis. Sustainability 13, 3578 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, H. et al. Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01375-y (2021).

  • Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411–413 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Soest, H. L. et al. Analysing interactions among sustainable development goals with integrated assessment models. Glob. Transit. 1, 210–225 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McLaren, D. & Markusson, N. The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 392–397 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pereira, L. M. et al. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People Nat. 2, 1172–1195 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preston, B. L. et al. Scale and the representation of human agency in the modeling of agroecosystems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 239–249 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Otto, I. M. et al. Human agency in the Anthropocene. Ecol. Econ. 167, 106463 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saltelli, A. et al. Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto. Nature 582, 482–484 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Redpath, S. M. et al. Games as tools to address conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 415–426 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Speelman, E. N. et al. Serious gaming as a tool to facilitate inclusive business; a review of untapped potential. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 41, 31–37 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rooney-Varga, J. N. et al. Combining role-play with interactive simulation to motivate informed climate action: evidence from the World Climate simulation. PLoS ONE 13, e0202877 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, C. A. et al. The global forest transition as a human affair. One Earth 2, 417–428 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roese, N. J. & Epstude, K. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 56 (ed. Olson, J. M.) 1–79 (Academic Press, 2017).

  • Fernbach, P. M. et al. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychol. Sci. 24, 939–946 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reddie, A. W. et al. Next-generation wargames. Science 362, 1362–1364 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lofgren, E. T. & Fefferman, N. H. The untapped potential of virtual game worlds to shed light on real world epidemics. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7, 625–629 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kleinschroth, F., Garcia, C. & Ghazoul, J. Reconciling certification and intact forest landscape conservation. Ambio 48, 153–159 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamto, M. et al. Using role-play to explore strategies for improving palm oil production and sustainability in Cameroon. ETFRN NEWS 139 (accessed 25 September 2021).

  • Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vennix, J. A. M. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 15, 379–401 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Biggs, D. et al. The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could ‘mental models’ help? Conserv. Lett. 4, 169–183 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelly, G. A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs: Clinical Diagnosis and Psychotherapy (Routledge, 2003).

  • Marengo, L. & Zeppini, P. The arrival of the new. J. Evol. Econ. 26, 171–194 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kremer, M. & Debo, L. Inferring quality from wait time. Manage. Sci. 62, 3023–3038 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chong, D. et al. When self‐interest matters. Polit. Psychol. 22, 541–570 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, C. A. et al. Coffee, farmers, and trees—shifting rights accelerates changing landscapes. Forests 11, 480 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus English edn first published in 1922 (Routledge, 2019).

  • Fauvelle, E. & Garcia, C. AgriForEst: un jeu pour élaborer des scénarios sur un terroir villageois d’Afrique Centrale. VertigO https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.23245 (2018).

  • Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Vol. 2 (Stanford Univ. Press, 1962).

  • Schmierbach, M. et al. No one likes to lose. J. Media Psychol. 26, 105–110 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wood, S. L. & Lynch, J. G. Jr Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning. J. Consum. Res. 29, 416–426 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ottati, V. et al. When self-perceptions of expertise increase closed-minded cognition: the earned dogmatism effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 61, 131–138 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mermet, L. Strategic Environmental Management Analysis: Addressing the Blind Spots of Collaborative Approaches. Collection Idées pour le débat 5 (IDDRI, 2011).

  • Barnaud, C. et al. in Companion Modelling (ed. Étienne, M.) 127–153 (Springer, 2014).

  • Ferris, F. D., von Gunten, C. F. & Emanuel, L. L. Knowledge: insufficient for change. J. Palliat. Med. 4, 145–147 (2001).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, W. J. & Krajbich, I. Computational modeling of epiphany learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4637–4642 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castelfranchi, C. Mind as an anticipatory device: for a theory of expectations. In International Symposium on Brain, Vision, and Artificial Intelligence (eds De Gregorio, M. et al.) 258–276 (Springer, 2005).

  • Garcia, C., Dray, A. & Waeber, P. Learning begins when the game is over: using games to embrace complexity in natural resources management. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 25, 289–291 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Arnstein, S. R. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 35, 216–224 (1969).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nielsen, K. S. et al. The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y (2021).

  • Bandura, A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 164–180 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Page, C. et al. Exploring how knowledge and communication influence natural resources management with ReHab. Simul. Gaming 47, 257–284 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation; tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. BioScience 52, 143–150 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meyfroidt, P. et al. Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob. Environ. Change 53, 52–67 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bastin, J. F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kleinschroth, F. & Healey, J. R. Impacts of logging roads on tropical forests. Biotropica 49, 620–635 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pea, R.D. in Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations (ed. Salomon, G.) 47–87 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).

  • Dudman, K. & de Wit, S. An IPCC that listens: introducing reciprocity to climate change communication. Clim. Change 168, 2 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, C., Cornioley, T., Chamagne, J. & Dillmann, C. Defining Indicators for Intact Forest Landscapes in the Congo Basin by Using a Role-Playing Game (FSC, 2017); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.16645